设为首页 加入收藏 登录旧版
两种镍钛记忆合金腕骨四角融合器治疗舟骨骨不连性腕塌陷的对比研究
A comparative study of two NiTi shape memory alloy four-corner arthrodesis concentrator for the treatment of navicular malunion wrist collapse
投稿时间:2024-05-24  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5972.2025.01.003
中文关键词:    腕塌陷  骨不连
英文关键词:Carpal  Wrist collapse  Osseous discontinuity
基金项目:云南省创伤骨科临床医学中心(第二周期)
作者单位邮编
齐保闯 中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九二〇医院骨科云南 昆明650032
云南省中医医院/云南中医药大学第一附属医院骨伤中心云南 昆明650021 
650021
孟晨 中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九二〇医院骨科云南 昆明650032 650032
罗欢 中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九二〇医院骨科云南 昆明650032 650032
李川 中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九二〇医院骨科云南 昆明650032 650032
徐永清* 中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九二〇医院骨科云南 昆明650032 650032
摘要点击次数: 38
全文下载次数: 11
中文摘要:
      目的 比较经腕背侧入路应用改良前后的镍钛记忆合金腕骨四角融合器(NiTi shape memory ally four-corner arthrodesis concentrator, NT-MFCAC)治疗舟骨骨不连性腕塌陷(scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse, SNAC)的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九二〇医院2009年5月至2022年5月行外科手术治疗的56例舟骨骨不连性腕塌陷患者的临床资料。其中,26例行改良前四角融合器固定(改良前组),30例行改良后四角融合器固定(改良后组)。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、腕骨融合时间、并发症发生率,以及术前,术后6个月、12个月、末次随访时快速臂肩手功能障碍评分(Quick DASH)和末次随访时腕关节活动度(ROM)。结果 56例均得到随访,随访时间24 ~ 60个月,平均(40.02±7.97)个月。两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、腕骨融合时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。末次随访时两组间数据比较Quick DASH评分明显优于术后6个月、12个月,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05);末次随访时两组间腕关节ROM比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访期间改良后组有1例出现并发症,低于改良前组的3例,但是两组在并发症发生率方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者随访期间均未出现切口感染、骨不连等并发症。结论 两种腕骨融合器在治疗舟骨骨不连性腕塌陷中均取得良好的疗效,而改良镂空四角融合器节约材料、方便术中植骨及术后观察骨融合情况等优点,是治疗舟骨骨不连性腕塌陷的有效方法。
英文摘要:
      Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of the NiTi shape memory ally four-corner arthrodesis concentrator NT-MFCAC before and after modification for the treatment of navicular malunion wrist collapse via dorsal wrist approach.Methods The clinical data of 56 patients with navicular malunion wrist collapse who underwent surgical treatment in the 920th Hospital of the People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force from May 2009 to May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, of which 26 cases underwent fixation with a modified anterior four-corner arthrodesis concentrator (the pre-modified group), and 30 cases underwent fixation with a modified posterior four-corner arthrodesis concentrator (the post-modified group). The operative time, intraoperative bleeding, time to bone fusion, complication rate, and Quick Arm Shoulder Hand Dysfunction Score (Quick DASH) at preoperative, 6 months, 12 months, and final follow-up and wrist range of motion (ROM) at final follow-up were compared between the two groups.Results All 56 cases were followed up for 24-60 months, with a mean time of (40.02±7.97) months. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of mean operative time, intraoperative bleeding and carpal fusion time (P>0.05). The Quick DASH scores of the two groups at the final follow-up were significantly better than those at 6 and 12 months after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in wrist ROM at the final follow-up, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). During the follow-up period, the modified group had 1 case of complication, which was significantly lower than the 3 cases in the unmodified group. However, when comparing the complication rates between the two groups, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). No complications such as incision infection and bone nonunion occurred in either groups during the follow-up period.Conclusion Both types of carpal fusion devices achieved good efficacy in the treatment of navicular malunion wrist collapse, while the modified skeletonized quadrangular fusion device has the advantages of fewer complications and convenient observation of bone fusion, making it an effective method choice for the treatment of navicular malunion wrist collapse.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
扫码关注
《生物骨科材料与临床研究》微信公众号