设为首页 加入收藏 登录旧版
人工关节置换治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨近端骨折的效果观察*
The effect of artificial joint replacement on proximal femoral fractures in older osteoporosis patients
  
DOI:
中文关键词:  人工关节  老年  骨质疏松  股骨近端骨折  回顾性研究
英文关键词:Artificial joint  Older  Osteoporosis  Proximal femoral fracture  Retrospective study
基金项目:
作者单位
尹德龙1 曾敬1* 郭风劲2 胡汉生1 曾勉东1 余升华1 李远辉1 邱勤业1  
通讯作者:尹德龙1 曾敬1* 郭风劲2 胡汉生1 曾勉东1 余升华1 李远辉1 邱勤业1    
摘要点击次数: 515
全文下载次数: 338
中文摘要:
      目的 对本院及武汉同济医院老年骨质疏松并发股骨近端骨折进行人工关节置换的病人资料进行分析观察其治疗效果。 方法 采用回顾性分析的研究方法,对本院及武汉同济医院骨科收治的2015年6月至2017年10月因轻微外伤致股骨近端骨折行关节置换术的95例老年病人进行疗效分析并随访,对手术时间、术中出血量、术后下床行康复锻炼的时间,术后并发症进行分析;并对病人行术前、术后及末次随访时进行Harris评分、VAS疼痛评分进行评定。 结果 所有病人均顺利完成手术治疗,其中股骨颈骨折病人78例,股骨转子间骨折病人17例,随访8~34个月(平均13.4个月)。所有随访病人术后未出现感染、假体周围骨折、下肢深静脉血栓等并发症。手术时间平均(63.50±11.50)min、术中出血量平均(85.00±4.50) mL,术后可早期下床行康复锻炼(3.00±0.50)天;按Harris评分、VAS疼痛评分进行近期效果评估。术前、术后及随访末次Harris评分分别为:(30.60±4.15)分;(23~52分)(65.30±5.25)分(58~79分);(79.50±8.65)分(75~92分),术前、术后及末次随访VAS平均分(8.26±0.70)分(7~10分);(4.18±1.55)分(3~6分);(1.65±2.15)分(0~3分)。术前与末次随访时Harris评分及VAS评分均较前明显改善,有统计学差异(P<0.05)。 结论 人工关节置换术对于老年骨质疏松性股骨近端骨折患者的治疗效果确切,术后病人可早期下床康复,对疼痛缓解及髋关节功能均明显改善,有利于病人尽早回归伤前生活方式。
英文摘要:
      Objective To analyze the patient data of artificial joint replacement for older osteoporosis with proximal femoral fractures in our hospital and Tongji Hospital to observe the effect. Methods Retrospective analysis was used to analyze and follow up of the 95 cases with osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures from Junuary 2015 to October 2017 of orthopedic treatment in Tongji Hospital and our hospital, from the time of operation, blood loss, the time of rehabilitation from post-operation, and the postoperative complications. The patients were also evaluated by Harris scores and VAS scores before and after operation and last follow-up. Results All patients were successfully completed operation, including 78 cases of femoral neck fracture, 17 patients with intertrochanteric fractures, followed by 8-34 months (average 13.4 months).All follow-up patients had no complications such as infection, peripheral fractures and deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities. Operative time was (63.50±11.50) mins, blood loss was (85.00±4.50) mL, time of rehabilitation was (3.00±0.50) days; the short-term effect was evaluated by Harris Score and VAS Score. The Harris scores of the preoperative, postoperative and the last follow-up were: (30.60±4.15); (23~52) points (65.30±5.25) (58~79) points; (79.50±8.65) (75~92) points, The VAS scores of the preoperative, postoperative and the last follow-up were: (8.26±0.70) (7~10) points; (4.18±1.55) (3~6) points; (1.65±2.15) (0~3) points. There was a statistically significant difference between the preoperative and the last follow-up compared to the Harris score and VAS score (P<0.05). Conclusion The artificial joint replacement for the older patients with osteoporotic hip fracture can lead to early recovery, pain relief and hip function are significantly improved, to facilitate the early return to the pre-injury lifestyle.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
扫码关注
《生物骨科材料与临床研究》微信公众号