| Objective To compare the effect of two different bone-harvesting sites in the treatment of single endogenous chondroma of the hand. Methods Thirty seven cases of single endogenous chondroma of the hand admitted to our hospital from March 2014 to November 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. In the experimental group, 17 patients received focus curettement and bone graft from ipsilateral distal radius; and in the control group, 20 patients received focus curettement and bone graft from the ipsilateral ilium. The operation time, hospitalization costs and Kazwcki postoperative hand function score other relevant indicators were compared. Results ①There was no significant difference in age, sex and preoperative course between the two groups (P>0.05). ②The operation time and hospitalization expenses in the experimental group were respectively（74.43±11.70）min and （8 544.00±768.02）yuan, which were（104.86±3.85） min and （10 378.00±72.86） yuan respectively in the control group. Compared with the control group, the operation time and hospitalization cost in the experimental group were significantly shortened(P<0.05). ③The excellent and good rate was 70.59% and 85.00% in the experimental and control group according to Kazwcki postoperative hand function score for endogenous chondroma, showing no significant difference(P=0.289). Conclusion Focus curettement and bone graft from ipsilateral distal radius has the advantages of short operation time, low cost and simple operation in the treatment of single endogenous chondroma of the hand. It is an clinical effective, economic and time-effective treatment method. |
