设为首页 加入收藏 登录旧版
6种内固定方式在固定指骨侧副韧带撕脱性骨折中的力学稳定性比较
Comparison of mechanical stability of six internal fixation methods in fixing avulsion fracture of phalangeal collateral ligament
投稿时间:2022-03-10  修订日期:2022-05-11
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5972.2022.06.002
中文关键词:  指骨  侧副韧带  撕脱性骨折
英文关键词:Phalange  Collateral ligament  Avulsion fracture
基金项目:武汉市卫生与计划生育委员会2020年医学科研项目面上项目(WZ20B29)
作者单位E-mail
尚晓强* 武汉红十字会医院骨科湖北 武汉430015 shang_xiao_qiang@126.com 
段祥林* 武汉红十字会医院骨科湖北 武汉430015 823692735@qq.com 
周祥昆 武汉红十字会医院骨科湖北 武汉430015  
陶圣祥 武汉大学中南医院骨科湖北 武汉430071  
郑洲 湖北中医药大学解剖教研室湖北 武汉430070  
摘要点击次数: 158
全文下载次数: 177
中文摘要:
      目的 对比分析6种内固定方式在固定指骨侧副韧带撕脱性骨折中的力学稳定性。方法 将6对新鲜手标本的近节指骨制作成侧副韧带撕脱性骨折模型。一对手分为观察组和对照组:观察组均采用新型钩钢板固定;对照组拇指行自制带钩钢板固定,示指行微型螺钉固定,中指行克氏针固定,环指行普通钢板塑形后固定,小指行横形微型带钩钢板固定。对侧副韧带加载测试,记录骨折端分离2 mm的最大张力,对比分析力学差异。结果 观察组拇指、示指、中指、环指、小指近节骨折端分离2 mm的最大张力分别为:(62.67±5.52)N、(58.22±5.23)N、(55.63±4.17)N、(48.57±4.50)N、(48.58±1.56)N;对照组分别为:(51.13±4.03)N、(22.88±3.52)N、(24.87±3.48)N、(47.17±2.77)N、(31.90±2.83)N。力学测试中环指组对比未见明显差异,余手指组观察组与对照组差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 新型钩钢板和普通塑形钢板固定在手指侧副韧带撕脱性骨折的固定中具有较强的生物力学稳定性。
英文摘要:
      Objective To compare the mechanical stability of six internal fixation methods in the treatment of avulsion fracture of collateral ligament of the phalange.Methods Six pairs of fresh hand specimens were made into the avulsion fracture model of collateral ligament. A pair of hands were divided into experimental group and control group. The experimental group was fixed with new hook plate. In the control group, the thumb was fixed with self-made hook plate, the index finger was fixed with micro screw, the middle finger was fixed with Kirschner wire, and the ring finger was fixed with ordinary plate, the little finger was fixed with transverse micro hook steel plate. The lateral collateral ligament was loaded to test, and the maximum tension of 2 mm was recorded and the mechanical difference was analyzed.Results The maximum tension of 2 mm was (62.67±5.52) N, (58.22±5.23) N, (55.63±4.17) N, (48.57±4.50) N, (48.58±1.56) N in the experimental group, and (51.13±4.03) N, (22.88±3.52) N, (24.87±3.48) N, (47.17±2.77) N, (31.90±2.83) N in the control group respectively. There was no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group in the mechanical test to the ring finger, but the difference between the experimental group and the control group to the other fingers was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion The new hook plate and ordinary plastic plate have strong biomechanical stability in the fixation of avulsion fracture of finger collateral ligament.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
扫码关注
《生物骨科材料与临床研究》微信公众号